Have you ever caught yourself wondering if the people you call friends are really your friends? Have you ever complained, “He only talks to me when he needs me” or “I only exist when you need something”?
Apparently, fake friends are the ones that only contact you when they need something. People who complain of fake friends feel unsatisfied in their friendships. They feel they’re being taken advantage of. They feel motivated to ditch their fake friends.
Why do we form friendships?
To understand the phenomenon of fake friends, we first need to understand why we form friendships in the first place. The golden principle underlying all friendships and relationships is mutual benefit. I can’t stress this point enough because everything revolves around it.
We form friendships because they help us satisfy our needs- material and psychological. After we’re born, our family members are our first friends. When we go to school, our family can’t be with us all the time so we satisfy our need for companionship, among other needs, by making friends.
Shared beliefs, culture, and values also play a role in determining who we call our friends. We have a tendency to identify with our friends, especially the ones that are closest to us. This is why close friends are often carbon copies of each other. They have a lot of things in common and their personalities match. They have things that they can think about together, topics they can talk about together and activities that they can do together.
This is encapsulated in how one’s closest friend is often called one’s alter ego- other self.
Wherefrom cometh fake friends?
Humans, for some reason, tend to overvalue their psychological needs. Even Maslow, famous for his hierarchy of needs, classified psychological and social needs as ‘higher’ needs compared to physiological needs. Because psychological needs have such elevated status, people classify those who help them satisfy these needs as ‘real’ friends or ‘true’ friends.
The thinking goes like this: “He doesn’t only reach out to me when he needs help but we can just hang out with each other, expecting nothing from each other. Hence, he’s my real friend.”
The problem with this type of thinking is that it’s wrong. Even when you’re just hanging out with your “real” friend, your needs are being satisfied- be it the need for companionship, sharing your life, talking about the things that matter to you, and so on.
Just because these needs are psychological, and your friend isn’t helping you in some conspicuous way, doesn’t make this friendship any different from the ones where the ‘give’ and ‘take’ is more conspicuous.
Since we overvalue our psychological needs we call friends who satisfy these needs as real friends.
In friendships where psychological needs are not being met, there’s a greater risk of these friendships falling into the vilified realm of fake friendships. But these friendships are just as valid, as long as the principle of mutual benefit holds.
The person complaining about having fake friends perceives that the principle of mutual benefit is being violated. There are two possibilities underlying such complaint:
The first possibility is that the fake friend isn’t satisfying the person’s psychological needs and so the latter is inclined to think that the friendship is fake. It’s not absolutely horrible when people contact you only when they need something because the mutual satisfaction of various needs, not just psychological needs, is what friendships are based on.
Say you feel bad that a friend calls you only when they need something. Next time you need something, you’re going to call them and they’ll think you only call them when you need something. See where I’m going with this?
Often, the people who make this complaint are usually the ones who’re not getting as much as they are giving. But this is not an excuse to call the friendship fake. They ignore that sometimes wanting help can be a good way to communicate again when the communication has been infrequent of late.
The second possibility is that the fake friend is indeed being exploitative. They only call when they need something and if you try and strike a conversation with them along the lines of “How’s it going?” they’ll show a lack of interest in pursuing that line of conversation.
This again shows how we value psychological needs more. We want them to know that we care about them and are not just interested in helping them out. If the fake friend were blunt and said, “I’d rather you only help me. Don’t try to satisfy my psychological needs”, you’d be offended and perhaps ditch the friend right away.
If you’re in a friendship where you think you’re being exploited, the best strategy is to ask your seemingly exploitative friend to help you as much as you’re helping them. Real friends will not make excuses and won’t have any problems in helping you, even if you ask for it over and over.
Even if you ask of them more than you’re giving them, they’ll help you. This isn’t necessarily because they’re selfless but because they trust in the mutuality of the friendship. They know that that you’d do the same for them. (see Reciprocal Altruism)
Importance of communication
Communication is the lifeblood of all relationships. When we need help from a friend of a friend, our friends often say something like, “But I haven’t even talked to him for months” or “We’re not even on talking terms”. This goes to show the importance of being on talking terms. We expect those people to favour us who are at least on talking terms with us.
When communication has long been absent, we’re unsure about the friendship and, consequently, whether or not we can succeed in obtaining favours.
The problem with communication is that the person who communicates first gives the impression that they’re in need and this can hurt their ego. So a person’s ego tries to prevent them from communicating first when communication has long been absent.
If a friend puts his ego aside and makes an effort to communicate with you when communication has been absent, then it’s a good sign that they value your friendship. Or they may suddenly be in need of something that they don’t mind putting their ego on a backseat for. Again, you can test that by steering the conversation toward psychological needs to check if they pursue it. Also, you can ask them for a counter-favour.
As long as the contract of mutual benefit holds, we’ve got a good friendship going on. Whenever one party perceives that the contract is being violated, the friendship is endangered. When both parties perceive that the contract has been violated, the friendship dies.
Hanan Parvez (M.B.A., M.A. Psychology) has written 300+ articles at www.psychmechanics.com, a blog with over 3 million views and 100k monthly visitors. His work has been featured on Forbes, Business Insider, Reader’s Digest, and Entrepreneur.